LISTEN TO THE NEWS HERE  - ECOUTEZ
LISTEN TO THE NEWS HERE - ECOUTEZ
UK Government Defends Foreign Aid Cuts Despite Warnings of Harm to Vulnerable Communities
Loading
/

The UK government has outlined details of its plan to slash foreign aid by 40%, prompting strong criticism from aid agencies and MPs who warn the cuts will disproportionately impact the world’s most vulnerable — particularly women and children in Africa.

The reduction, announced in February, will lower aid spending from 0.5% of gross national income to 0.3%. The move comes as the government seeks to boost defence spending to 2.5% of GDP, partly under pressure from the United States.

A Foreign Office impact assessment confirms that the most significant cuts this year will affect Africa, especially in areas such as girls’ education, women’s health, and water sanitation. The report warns that the cuts may increase the risk of disease, malnutrition, and death.

Aid groups and international development organisations have condemned the decision. UNICEF UK called the cuts “deeply short-sighted,” warning of a “devastating and unequal impact” on women and children. The agency urged the government to allocate at least 25% of aid spending to child-focused programmes.

Bond, a UK network for international aid organisations, accused the government of “deprioritising” essential sectors, including gender equality, education, and crisis response in conflict-hit countries like South Sudan, Ethiopia, Somalia, and the Occupied Palestinian Territories.

“The world’s most marginalised communities — especially those in conflict and women and girls — will pay the highest price for these political choices,” said Gideon Rabinowitz, Bond’s policy director.

Street Child, a UK-founded charity, said the cuts would force them to halt vital education programmes in countries such as Sierra Leone, South Sudan, and DR Congo.

“So children who used to go to school will not go to school,” said CEO Tom Dannatt. “More children will be found roaming the streets or working fields instead of learning to build brighter futures.”

Despite the widespread criticism, the government has defended its approach. Baroness Chapman, Minister for Development, said:

“Every pound must work harder for UK taxpayers and the people we help. These figures show how we are delivering more targeted, efficient support.”

The Foreign Office said the cuts followed a “line-by-line strategic review” focused on prioritising live contracts, planned humanitarian support, and a responsible exit from programmes deemed lower priority. While some bilateral support to countries will decline, the UK said it would maintain funding to multilateral bodies like the Gavi vaccine alliance and the World Bank’s International Development Association (IDA) — which will receive £1.98 billion over the next three years.

Critics in Parliament, including International Development Committee chair Sarah Champion, warned the cuts would come “at the expense of the world’s most vulnerable people”, while Liberal Democrat MP Monica Harding called it “the lowest level of UK aid this century”, predicting deeper cuts ahead.

Foreign aid has become increasingly controversial in the UK, with public support waning and ministers admitting the debate has been lost. The UK first reached the UN-backed target of spending 0.7% of national income on aid in 2013 under the coalition government, a commitment enshrined in law in 2015. But it was scaled back to 0.5% in 2021 amid Covid-related budget pressures — and now, even that is being rolled back further.


Piers Potter
Author: Piers Potter

Piers Potter

LAISSER UN COMMENTAIRE

S'il vous plaît entrez votre commentaire!
S'il vous plaît entrez votre nom ici